"What a thousand acres of Silphiums looked like when they tickled the bellies of the buffalo is a question never again to be answered, and perhaps not even asked." -Aldo Leopold
Morning-glory Prominent Schizura ipomoeae fam. Notodontidae Host plant: Oak species (Quercus sp) Date found: 24, Aug, 2024 Location Found: Schoolcraft Prairie, Washington County, MO Notes: Despite both its common and scientific names, it is highly unlikely this species ever feeds on morning glories (Ipomoea spp.).
Calico paint aka brown-hooded owlet (adult) Cucullia convexipennis fam. Noctuidae Host plant: Found on goldenrod (Solidago sp.) Date found: 24, Aug, 2024 Location Found: Schoolcraft Prairie, Washington County, MO
The year 2024 was a very notable year in our area. No, I’m not talking about the circus joke of an election coming up. Of course, I’m referring to the year of the Brood XIX periodical cicada emergence. Brood XIX, also known as the “Great Southern Brood,” holds a special place as a natural marvel. These periodical cicadas are a part of the Magicicada genus, known for their unique life cycle, which spans 13 years, culminating in a synchronized mass emergence.
A newly emerged Magicicada tredecassini photographed on May-11
Unlike annual cicadas, which appear every year, periodical cicadas have a distinctive life cycle, emerging in massive numbers after spending 13 or 17 years underground. These insects belong to three distinct species groups, with Brood XIX being part of the 13-year group that is comprised of four species: Magicicada tredecim, M. tredecassini, M. tredecula, and M. neotredecim. Cicada broods are geographically isolated populations that emerge in synchrony, making their appearance not only rare but region-specific. Brood XIX has a vast range, covering at least portions of 11 states across much of the southeastern United States.
A newly emerged Magicicada tredecassini photographed on May-18
Life Cycle of Brood XIX The life of a Brood XIX cicada is primarily hidden underground, where they live as nymphs, feeding on sap from tree roots. For 13 years, they remain underground, quietly developing and maturing. Then, seemingly overnight, millions emerge from the soil in an overwhelming display of nature’s rhythm. Once they emerge, their primary purpose is reproduction.
Adult cicadas live only for a few weeks. During this time, males produce loud, buzzing mating calls using specialized structures called tymbals. These mating calls fill the air, creating a chorus that can reach deafening levels in regions with high cicada density. After mating, females lay eggs in tree branches, and once the eggs hatch, the nymphs fall to the ground and burrow into the soil, starting the 13-year cycle anew.
Magicicada tredecassini
The Mystery of Synchronized Emergence One of the most intriguing aspects of Brood XIX is the synchronized nature of their emergence. The question remains: how do they know it’s time to come out? Scientists believe cicadas track environmental clues, such as soil temperature, to time their appearance. When the soil reaches about 64°F (18°C), it signals that it is time for the cicadas to surface.
This poor guy was not able to emerge from its final larval form
The reason for their long, synchronized life cycles is believed to be a survival strategy known as predator satiation. By emerging in overwhelming numbers all at once, they reduce the likelihood of being completely eaten by predators. There are simply too many cicadas for predators to consume, ensuring that enough survive to reproduce.
Additionally, 13 and 17 are both prime numbers and this is not likely a mere coincidence. Because these intervals are in prime-numbered years, it is nearly impossible for these patterns to overlap with the breeding strategies of would-be predators.
Periodical cicada (Magicicada spp.) exuviae
The Ecological Importance of Cicadas Though their emergence may seem disruptive, periodical cicadas play a vital role in the ecosystem. Their sheer numbers provide a feast for predators, from birds to mammals, and their death leaves behind nutrient-rich carcasses that fertilize the soil.
While some may find them a nuisance due to their loud calls and vast numbers, these insects do not pose a significant threat to crops or forests. Their presence is fleeting, and they leave behind a healthier environment in their wake.
Of the millions of cicadas that emerged in our neighborhood, many had issues with expanding their wings as shown here. These individuals become likely calories for others and will not be able to pass on their genes to the next generation.
That thin line… I’m sure you’ll agree that anyone with a shred of curiosity about the natural world would find what I shared here of immense interest. As a naturalist, I am still overwhelmed by what I observed for a few weeks in May in our suburban St. Louis County neighborhood. I spent many hours in amazed observation, watching them climb as freshly emerged adults, listening to their midday chorus and observing as my watch counted more than 100 decibels standing in our front yard.
Mating Magicicada tredecassini
As mentioned above, it is true that in the grand scheme of ecology, these creatures provide nothing but benefit – except, if you are a young woody plant. This is where I found my my awe and fascination becoming replaced with a red, searing rage. For those who may not know, I have spent considerable time, effort, and money over the past four years planting approximately 50 trees and bushes in our once florally depauperate yard. The spring and early summer of 2024 were turning out to be absolutely perfect in regards to establishing woody plants. Temperatures were mild and rains were plentiful.
Although the periodical cicadas did not use my potted fig tree in the backyard for ovipositing, this pair of Magicicada tredecassini found it a fine place for “making babies.”
Then I slowly realized the numbers of cicadas emerging in our neighborhood and the pressure my plants were soon to receive from the thousands of ovipositing females that were looking for just what my yard provided. The ovipositors of the female cicada are sharp and literally metal-studded. These guys are as apt as beavers when working with wood. Heavy pressures from swarming periodical cicadas can and do kill young trees. Cicadas love young trees for depositing their eggs because there are plenty of branches that are the perfect size — about the diameter of a pencil. They especially love young trees that are exposed to the full sun. This makes tremendous evolutionary sense. A young tree that is in full-sun will typically have all the advantages for growing and will therefore more likely be around for the full 13 years that it knows its offspring will need to feed on its host’s roots. I will never forget shaking young dogwood trees in the front yard and watching as hundreds of cicadas swarmed off of them, most simply flying for 50 feet or so and turning right around to land in the same tree.
An example of the pressures of the Brood XIX cicadas on the young and establishing trees in our suburban yard.
Over the next month or so I watched as limb after limb on most of my trees browned and succumbed to the damage done by the heavy onslaught of ovipositing females. I filled several trash cans with limbs that were either self-pruned or that I removed once they were certainly dead. No tree in my yard has died at the time of my writing this, but most plants were significantly set back in their efforts in becoming established. I will have to wait and hope that most will make it through the coming winter season.
Magicicada neotredecim ovipositing on branches of Cotinus obovatus (American smoke tree).
I made a list of the 26 plants I recorded that were used for ovipositing by the Magicicada cicadas in our yard. With a couple of exceptions, this list comprises every woody species in the yard. I even recorded them ovipositing in the herbaceous forb, Penstemon digitalis.
List of plants used by ovipositing Magicicada Brood XIX cicadas in a St. Louis County yard in 2024 eruption. Amelanchier arborea, Amorpha fruticosa, Aronia melanocarpa, Asimina triloba, Carpinus caroliniana, Cephalanthus occidentalis, Cercis canadensis, Cornus florida, Cotinus obovatus, Diospyros virginiana, Euonymus americanus, Euonymus atropurpureus, Gymnocladus dioicus, Hamamelis virginiana, H. vernalis, Lindera benzoin, Nyssa sylvatica, Penstemon digitalis, Physocarpus opulifolius, Prunus americana, P. serotina, Quercus bicolor, Q. muehlenbergii, Q. shumardii, Sassafras albidum, Viburnum dentatum
Of the plants listed above, particularly high preference seemed to be for the redbuds, dogwoods and oaks. I’m not sure if there is really some taxa preference or if these particular plants simply had more of the best sized limbs.
“Flagging” injury on Quercus shumardii caused by cicada ovipositing“Flagging” injury on Cotinus obovatu caused by cicada ovipositing
A Magicicada sp cicada ovipositing on a stem of the herbaceous Penstemon digitalis.
With hopes of photographing the full cicada lifecycle, I collected quite a few stems from trees that were dropped due to the damage they received or that I removed myself. Unfortunately, my insect rearing skills need some work and I never did see a newly emerged cicada nymph. I did cut into some branches and photographed the eggs.
Eggs from Magicicada sp cicada that were inserted into the pith of Amorpha fruticosa stems. Up to 30 eggs may be inserted in each incision the female makes in the plant and a single female may lay up to 600 eggs in her life.
The next generation…? Despite the angst and dread this caused when wondering what would become of my woodies that I have spent so much time in watering and protecting from deer over the past several years, I was very pleased to live in a place that still had natural wonders such as this. If the damage caused to my trees indicates the potential success of the next Group XIX emergence, then I am happy and will look forward to the next time we see these guys, assuming I am fortunate enough to be here in 13 years. Hopefully enough of my trees will survive to help them on their way.
Many thanks to Andy Reago & Chrissy McClarren who made the really nice find of these two amazing long-horned beetles, the amorpha borer, Megacyllene decora. While hunting rare birds at Columbia Bottom, C.A., we luckily ran into these guys and were able to take advantage by getting some photos. This was the first time I have seen this species in person.
Acronicta increta Dagger Complex Difficult to discern as larvae and adults. Complex composed of A. albarufa, A. increta, A. ovata, andA. tristis. Fam. Noctuidae Host plant: Found on variety of oak (Quercus spp.)
IC 1396 Approximately 2400 light years from earth, just outside the constellation Cepheus in a rich region of the milky way of our northern sky, lies a dense emission nebula catalogued as IC 1396. A birth place for stars, this huge and roughly spherical grouping of nebulosity is approximately 3° wide. The interior of this sphere houses a cluster of stars formed from the internal condensing gases. With most of these gases used up in the production of these bright young stars, the interior now contains minimal nebulosity. These new stars now provide the energy that excites the remaining hydrogen gas in the nebulosity shell, and is responsible for the magenta-red appearance.
This region contains numerous catalogued points of interest, including quite a few dark nebulae that thread their way around the shell’s perimeter. These dark nebulae lie between us and the radiating stars of the shell’s interior.
The most famous feature of this deep sky object is IC 1396A, commonly known as the Elephant’s Trunk Nebula. In my image, it appears at approximately 9:00. This nodule of nebulosity is also a site of star formation. Recent infrared images have shown stars less than 100,000 years old within this pinnacle of dust and gas. The bright orange supergiant star known as Herschel’s Garnet Star lies to the north at 6:00. You can find an annotated version of my image by clicking here.
Collecting the data It had been about 10 months since I had an astrophotography outing. This was mostly due to life interfering during periods when the new moon met up with conducive weather. I guess I also wasn’t too excited about trying during warmer months with my astrocamera that has been plagued with the dreaded Canon sensor banding. For an October session, we would find unseasonably warm conditions that had me worried about this issues as well. Thankfully, this turned out to be a non-factor.
For the most part, weather and other conditions were near-perfect. Winds were a little higher than we would like to see them but were not a significant problem. Miguel and I travelled to our usual site at Whetstone Conservation Area. I was a bit surprised to see that the secret of this location was out – as several astronomers (seemingly all visual on this night) joined us. This was a hearty crowd but respectful and did not interfere with our activities.
Date and location Imaged on the night of 05/06 October 2024 at Whetstone Creek Conservation Area in Callaway County, Missouri (Bortle 3). Dark period: 20:09 – 05:37 Target period: 15:31 – 03:58
Conditions You gotta love a forecast for such a clear sky night so close to the new moon. Skies were forecast to be completely clear and they were. Temperature bottomed out in the mid sixties and winds were high, with some gusts peaking to 10 mph or more. This is not ideal, but I only threw out one sub that was blurred due to either wind or me bumping something during the exposure.
Equipment Astro-modified Canon 7D mkii camera, Askar ACL200 200mm f/4 lens (260mm focal length equivalent), Fornax LighTrack II tracking mount without guiding on a William Optics Vixen Wedge Mount. QHYCCD Polemaster. Gitzo CF tripod, Canon shutter release cable, laser pointer to help find Polaris and sky targets, lens warmer to prevent dew and frost on lens, dummy battery to power camera, lithium battery generator to provide power to camera, dew heater and laptop computer.
Imaging Details Lights taken (ISO 3200, f/4, 120 second exposure): 165 Lights after cull due to tracker error, wind, bumps, clouds, etc.: 164 Used best 90% of remaining frames for stack for a total of 147 subs used for integration (4h 54m) Calibration frames: none
Processing RAW files stacked in Astro Pixel Processor, GraXpert for gradient removal, Affinity Photo 2 with JR Astrophotography Macros v18 for stretching and other cosmetic adjustments.
Problems and learnings
Acquiring data Considering I took nearly a year off from astrophotography, I have to say that I was pleased with how well this night and the subsequent image turned out. Polar alignment was quick and easy and I had no problems getting the two-minute individual subs with my tracking. As the star scores suggest from APP, my initial focusing was off a bit, but I corrected for this approximately halfway through the night.
As usual, I struggled a bit more than I should have with finding and framing the target. I have a need to learn something here that I feel I would greatly benefit from. Typically, I don’t have much of an issue finding my target, using tools like star hopping and the oh-so-nice astronomy apps available on our phones. My issue lies in not knowing the exact orientation of the object when, in cases like these, the object is relatively dim and I cannot make it our very well in an individual sub. In this case, I found the Garnet Star, and could make out enough of the nebula to know that it was in my frame. However, I just wasn’t familiar enough with or confident I knew in which direction the object lied in relation to this indicator star to be able to set my composition. Ultimately, I did my best and crossed my fingers that I wasn’t going to be cutting off anything important in my composition.
To a well-seasoned observer of the night sky, this problem may sound ridiculous, but because of the earth’s rotation, the relationship in direction of the object to the indicator star can change over the course of the night. I don’t know. Maybe this is much easier than I make it out to be. However, this single problem typically costs me 1-2 hours of imaging time each session and I would love to get more efficient at this. Please let me know if you have any tips or tricks.
Keeping the ISO high and exposing a little more to the right seemed to keep the dreaded Canon banding away again. I suppose I can say this is a fruitful strategy and I will keep this up in the future.
Processing During my hiatus in AP, I have ditched all Adobe products and switched to Affinity Photo for my processing needs. I knew this was going to tax my already lacking AP processing abilities and it probably did. Someone who was skilled in the arts could probably do a much better job than I did. In this case, I manually performed the stretch and then finished it off with a few actions I found in a nice little bundle of AP macros made available by James Ritson.
One very surprising outcome for me was the fact that I somehow found a method for stretching that preserved the star colors. Even though I used methods that were supposed to do this in the past, this was never really the case and I was forced to exchange star color for bringing out the details in the DSO. What was the difference here? Beats me. Maybe I didn’t stretch this one as much as I typically would? Or, maybe there is something inherently different between doing these things in Affinity Photo compared to Photoshop?
Conclusion It was nice to be back in the AP saddle again. Longer nights on the cold side of the equinoxes make this a little more fun for me, although there are still a lot of summer objects I hope to get someday. I definitely need to improve my post processing, but so far, I like what I am able to do in Affinity Photo.
This is an area I hope to get back to next year by either attempting a tighter focal length of the elephant’s trunk or by going after other objects that are plentiful in the Cepheus region. As always, if you made it this far, thank you. I appreciate your attention.
Spiny Oak Slug Moth Euclea delphinii F. Limacodidae Host plant: Found on post oak (Quercus stellata) Date found: 17, Aug, 2024 Location Found: Schoolcraft Prairie, Washington County, MO